by The Lone Wolf


In an interview with political interviewer David Frost, taken on November 2, 2007, the recently assassinated Pakistani politician, and Pakistan People's Party chairwoman, Benazir Bhutto, claimed that Bin Laden had been murdered by Omar Sheikh. During her answer to a question pertaining to the identities of those who had previously attempted her own assassination, Bhutto named Sheikh as a possible suspect while referring to him as "the man who murdered Osama bin Laden." Despite the weight of such a statement, neither Bhutto nor Frost attempted to clarify it and no other mainstream media appears to have further inquired about it.  Nov 2007   EYEONCITRUS.COM

They are making a big deal out of capturing Osama bin Laden’s Son-in-Law alive! The question that needs to be ask why now is it so important, to capture him alive when that same opportunity presented itself when they had the chance on capturing Osama bin Laden, himself, alive? And if you believe Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan in a David Frost interview, where she mentioned that Osama bin Laden had been killed years before, which David Frost heard and never blinked an eye! Apparently, it was common knowledge for those in the know and not for the rest of us. She was murdered in December 2007. That can help explain why they didn’t take him alive and why they decided to bury him at sea, which doesn’t sound like a common practice for a Muslim living in a desert type country.

Of course, the answer is they are preparing an agenda for future military adventurism against Iran and what better way than saying Abu Ghaith’s has provided them with information which indicates that al Qaeda operatives are in Iran! Thus setting the stage for Israel’s mandate to invade Iran and being the faithful follower of Israel the United States is set on sacrificing it’s sons and daughters in another illegitimate call to arms. When the Nation hasn’t the funds to take care of it’s own citizens, it will be forgetful of that fact and set it’s eyes on Iran.

With the clamor that North Korea is making about nuking Washington, D.C., you would think that the attention to that would be paramount, yet, Washington has said that it can defend itself from such an attack, seemingly, taking a less concerned attitude for that situation. Once again, you have to ask yourself as to why such a response?

If Washington feels itself capable of defending such an action, surely, Israel, having the same arsenal at it’s disposal as the United States (never mind that Israel has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty for Nuclear weapons) could do likewise. Least we forget that the period during the cold war, there never occurred a nuclear attack between the Super Powers, Russia and the United States, or any other nation, because of the fear of nuclear retaliation with mutual destruction being the outcome of such action.

The United States uses al-Qaeda as both, the good guys with the white hats, when they are overthrowing Egypt, Libya, and attempting to overthrow, Syria. Yet, when Washington needs a bad guy, like in the false flag operation of 911, al-Qaeda, switches hat, from white to black, and becomes the bad guy. This will be the scenario for Iran, they can’t allow al-Oaeda into Iran because they might obtain nuclear weapons, these nut jobs who brought down the towers!!! All the while, the manipulators continue to escape their crimes, while the American taxpayers, pay and pay.

More on the capture here…