"There is no sworde to bee feared more than the Learned pen"

A.M. Arrest at 630 Pleasant Grove Road Inverness FL

In Another Major, Arrest, Citrus County Sheriff's Office, five year old, UPDATE FEB 14 2015 on kp01 at 311530

After examining the call tapes, the school called the Sheriff’s Office because a 5 year old was “terrorizing” (“key” word”) by wrapping his hands around the other child’s throat, a “1015” (arrest) was the result, the end results may have been overturned by a superior, information is unattainable.

image

This morning (Jan 30 2015) Citrus County Sheriff’s Deputy answered a call for a physical disturbance at 630 Pleasant Grove Road, Inverness FL. A battery occurred at the Pleasant Grove Elementary School, the suspect was questioned and then placed under arrest and transported to the youth facility for 5 year olds. The condition of the victim is unknown at this time. It has been undetermined if Miranda rights were read to the 5 year old and whether, if read, understood? Will the young man now have a criminal record following him for the rest of his life? Child records are sealed yet can be opened with the “authorities” deem it necessary, they are never expunged.

5 year old Arab boy arrested in Israel

As this is common practice in Israel (picture above) will it become prevalent in the United States?

Our Shadow Government CLICK HERE

In EYEONCITRUS.COM, NEW WORLD ORDER on kp24 at 311516

The article below explains how all incoming Presidents primarily maintain the policies of the former administrations, the reasons are quite clear, since they overthrew the elected Presidency of JFK by assassinating him along with any members of his family they thought that might have taken over his reign for the people, no President has had the courage to resist this band of elitists who operate within the compartmentalize framework of our Constitutional government thus ending Democracy, replacing it with a figurehead leader and Congress while it’s goals of the New World Order marches continually on….ED.

PUPPETS REPRESENTING THE NEW WORLD ORDER

By Jordan Michael Smith

October 19, 2014

The voters who put Barack Obama in office expected some big changes. From the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping to Guantanamo Bay to the Patriot Act, candidate Obama was a defender of civil liberties and privacy, promising a dramatically different approach from his predecessor.

But six years into his administration, the Obama version of national security looks almost indistinguishable from the one he inherited. Guantanamo Bay remains open. The NSA has, if anything, become more aggressive in monitoring Americans. Drone strikes have escalated. Most recently it was reported that the same president who won a Nobel Prize in part for promoting nuclear disarmament is spending up to $1 trillion modernizing and revitalizing America’s nuclear weapons.

Why did the face in the Oval Office change but the policies remain the same? Critics tend to focus on Obama himself, a leader who perhaps has shifted with politics to take a harder line. But Tufts University political scientist Michael J. Glennon has a more pessimistic answer: Obama couldn’t have changed policies much even if he tried.

Though it’s a bedrock American principle that citizens can steer their own government by electing new officials, Glennon suggests that in practice, much of our government no longer works that way. In a new book, “National Security and Double Government,” he catalogs the ways that the defense and national security apparatus is effectively self-governing, with virtually no accountability, transparency, or checks and balances of any kind. He uses the term “double government”: There’s the one we elect, and then there’s the one behind it, steering huge swaths of policy almost unchecked. Elected officials end up serving as mere cover for the real decisions made by the bureaucracy.

RELATED: Coverage of the 2014 midterm elections

Glennon cites the example of Obama and his team being shocked and angry to discover upon taking office that the military gave them only two options for the war in Afghanistan: The United States could add more troops, or the United States could add a lot more troops. Hemmed in, Obama added 30,000 more troops.

Glennon’s critique sounds like an outsider’s take, even a radical one. In fact, he is the quintessential insider: He was legal counsel to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a consultant to various congressional committees, as well as to the State Department. “National Security and Double Government” comes favorably blurbed by former members of the Defense Department, State Department, White House, and even the CIA. And he’s not a conspiracy theorist: Rather, he sees the problem as one of “smart, hard-working, public-spirited people acting in good faith who are responding to systemic incentives”—without any meaningful oversight to rein them in.

How exactly has double government taken hold? And what can be done about it? Glennon spoke with Ideas from his office at Tufts’ Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. This interview has been condensed and edited.

IDEAS: Where does the term “double government” come from?

GLENNON:It comes from Walter Bagehot’s famous theory, unveiled in the 1860s. Bagehot was the scholar who presided over the birth of the Economist magazine—they still have a column named after him. Bagehot tried to explain in his book “The English Constitution” how the British government worked. He suggested that there are two sets of institutions. There are the “dignified institutions,” the monarchy and the House of Lords, which people erroneously believed ran the government. But he suggested that there was in reality a second set of institutions, which he referred to as the “efficient institutions,” that actually set governmental policy. And those were the House of Commons, the prime minister, and the British cabinet.

IDEAS: What evidence exists for saying America has a double government?

GLENNON:I was curious why a president such as Barack Obama would embrace the very same national security and counterterrorism policies that he campaigned eloquently against. Why would that president continue those same policies in case after case after case? I initially wrote it based on my own experience and personal knowledge and conversations with dozens of individuals in the military, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies of our government, as well as, of course, officeholders on Capitol Hill and in the courts. And the documented evidence in the book is substantial—there are 800 footnotes in the book.

2014 in review

In EYEONCITRUS.COM on kp05 at 311502

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The concert hall at the Sydney Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 21,000 times in 2014. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 8 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 380 other followers

%d bloggers like this: